Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA

[Brad Boyer]

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:23:20AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Currently, the only architectures that don't set HAS_DMA are h8300, m32r
> m68k (except SUN3 and Coldfire), microblaze and s390.
> s390 will never get it, microblaze is currently implementing dma-mapping.h.
> 
> The other three are still using drivers/ide instead of drivers/ata.
> 
> One way to fix this would be to implement dma-mapping.h in h8300, m32r and
> m68k and leave !HAS_DMA as the obscure s390 case (this one already can't
> use ATA because of !HAS_MMIO).

If I'm reading the m68k code correctly, SUN3 is the one that doesn't have
DMA. It is implemented on any m68k with a standard Motorola MMU. It might
be possible to get the DMA code working on a sun3, but I doubt they ever
have IDE hardware.

	Brad Boyer
	flar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/