Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon May 11 2009 - 08:18:25 EST


On Fri 2009-05-08 00:37:39, trekker.dk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Well...
>
> >
> >
> >To summarise disadvantages:
> >
> >- only core has 8000 LoC
> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
> >
>
> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
>

Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/