Re: [PATCH 18/18] block: implement and enforce request peek/start/fetch

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Friday 08 May 2009 04:54:16 Tejun Heo wrote:
> Till now block layer allowed two separate modes of request execution.
> A request is always acquired from the request queue via
> elv_next_request().  After that, drivers are free to either dequeue it
> or process it without dequeueing.  Dequeue allows elv_next_request()
> to return the next request so that multiple requests can be in flight.
> 
> Executing requests without dequeueing has its merits mostly in
> allowing drivers for simpler devices which can't do sg to deal with
> segments only without considering request boundary.  However, the
> benefit this brings is dubious and declining while the cost of the API
> ambiguity is increasing.  Segment based drivers are usually for very
> old or limited devices and as converting to dequeueing model isn't
> difficult, it doesn't justify the API overhead it puts on block layer
> and its more modern users.
> 
> Previous patches converted all block low level drivers to dequeueing
> model.  This patch completes the API transition by...
> 
> * renaming elv_next_request() to blk_peek_request()
> 
> * renaming blkdev_dequeue_request() to blk_start_request()
> 
> * adding blk_fetch_request() which is combination of peek and start
> 
> * disallowing completion of queued (not started) requests
> 
> * applying new API to all LLDs
> 
> Renamings are for consistency and to break out of tree code so that
> it's apparent that out of tree drivers need updating.
> 
> [ Impact: block request issue API cleanup, no functional change ]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/