Re: [PATCH] x86-64: improve e820_search_gap()

[H. Peter Anvin]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Well right now we ignore ACPI/PNP data, sometimes ignore PCI data 
> and only look in e820 and sometimes only use PCI/e820 and sometimes
> only use SRAT (or at least it was like this at some point)
> 

That *is* a conflict resolution policy.  Quite probably an accidental one.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/