Re: [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, take #3

[Tejun Heo]

Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> I'll post the updated libfuse patch as well.  Please let me know if
>>>> you find anything wrong with the current patches.
>>> Looks good to me.  Much prettier with two inits merged.
>> Oh... what happened to CUSE_INIT_DONE?
> 
> By moving the CUSE_INIT reply processing into the ->end() callback,
> the device initialization becomes synchronous with the process writing
> the message into the cuse device.
> 
> This means, that the process can simply wait for the write() on the
> device to complete before proceeding.
> 
> I've updated the libfuse patch so it calls ->init_done() after sending
> the CUSE_INIT reply.

Ah... cool.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/