Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[Fabio Comolli]

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu 2009-05-07 20:57:44, Fabio Comolli wrote:
...
>>
>> Well, if I may jump in I suggest you start with the full-memory image
>> functionality. This is in my opinion the biggest advantage in tuxonice
>> vs. uswsusp.
>
> Neither tuxonice nor swsusp can write full-memory image (it is mostly
> impossible to do in unlikely case of all memory is consumed by
> kmalloc). Now, tuxonice can produce bigger images than swsusp...
>

Pavel, please. (u)swsusp can save images up to half the physical
memory IIRC; with toi I used to easily save 980MB of image on a 1GB
laptop. You can't honestly compare the two things.

> Rafael had short patch for similar efect some time ago, but we could
> not find anyone to really review it...
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂPavel
> --

Regards,
Fabio




> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/