Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k

[Jason Daly]

Thanks for the kernel info.

How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k?  Currently 
the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything 
greater than g.

Thanks
-JD

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1]
> > > (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to
> > > let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k:
> > >
> > >  *  >= 2.6.27.22
> > >  *  >= 2.6.28.10
> > >  *  2.6.29
> > >
> > > If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29.
> > > If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285
> > > devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to
> > > start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still
> > > in RC series).
> > >
> > > As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or
> > > another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to
> > > be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for
> > > stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3].
> > >
> > >  Luis
> > >
> > > [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
> > > [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download
> > > [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable
> > Thanks for the update.  If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it
> > still best to use wireless-testing?  Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc
> > series net-next or wireless-next?
>
> Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if
> you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own
> kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save
> buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless
> with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to
> the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to
> backport this (so we just drop them).
>
>   Luis
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/