Re: [patch 1/5] oom: cleanup android low memory killer

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 4 May 2009, Greg KH wrote:

> > > > This patch in the series is really more of a convenience than anything 
> > > > else since it doesn't change anything functionally.  I had to modify the 
> > > > lowmemorykiller later because there's a potential for a NULL pointer from 
> > > > dereferencing p->mm without holding task_lock(p) and also because I moved 
> > > > oomkilladj from struct task_struct to struct mm_struct.
> > > 
> > > Is this still the case on top of Arve's changes?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, the first of two patches Arve just sent is broken:
> 
> Ok, care to work with Arve to come up with a series that both of you
> agree will work properly?
> 

I'll rebase my patchset on Linus' -git plus Arve's latest two patches 
which seem to apply nicely and send them to both you and Andrew.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/