Re: Specific support for Intel Atom architecture

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sun May 03 2009 - 14:42:21 EST


Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> $(call cc-option,-march=atom,-march=i686)
>>> if it's an in-order architecture, wouldn't it be better to tune for
>>> i386 or i486 instead ?
>> -march isn't about tuning, it's about supported instructions.
>
> agreed, but unless specified otherwise using -mtune, -march also sets
> default tuning for the indicated CPU. At least in my experience.
>
>> The right line is
>> $(call cc-option,-march=atom,-march=core2)

For really old gcc's (we support all the way back to gcc 3.2 still)
-march=core2 might not work either.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/