Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:02:00 Greg KH wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
> > > > > regression as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4
> > > >
> > > > Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> > >
> > > It should be this one 35a7433c789ba6df6d96b70fa745ae9e6cac0038.
> >
> > Looks good, we should queue it up for the next release (at 100 patches,
> > this one looks pretty full...)
> 
> OK, but if at all possible please squeeze it in in .2. I copied stable twice I 
> think during the discussion about this regression which was almost one month 
> ago now.

Yes, but you never provided the git commit id of the patch that is in
Linus's tree to us.  Without that, knowing what to add to the -stable
tree is pretty much impossible, given our current workload of the
-stable queue.

Please make it very easy on us, we are slow :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/