Re: linux-next ia64 build problems in slqb

[Paul Mundt]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:02:06AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > One minor nit: the patch should define an empty static inline of
> > > claim_remote_free_list() for the !SMP case. I can fix it at my end
> > > before merging, though, if necessary.
> > 
> > Agreed.  It would be better to have an empty static inline than
> > adding the noisy #ifdef SMP around every call to
> > claim_remote_free_list() ... in fact some such #ifdef can be
> > removed.
> > 
> > You could tag such a modified patch (attached) as:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks for the help! I went and merged the following patch and I hope I 
> got all the patch attributions right. Paul, does this work for you as well?
> 
Yup, works fine for me, thanks for taking care of this.

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/