Re: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional

[Andre Noll]

On 20:31, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Really? Easier than keeping only two 256-byte arrays for exp() and
> > log() and use these at runtime to populate the (dynamically allocated)
> > 64K GF multiplication table? That seems to be really simple and would
> > still shave off 64K of kernel memory for raid5-only users.
> >
> > Andre
> 
> Oh, you mean when the first raid6 device is started and not when the
> module is loaded.

Yes, that's what I was trying to say.

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature