Re: [PATCH] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unless system ispowering off

From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Date: Tue Apr 21 2009 - 17:53:22 EST


On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:13:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > After experimenting with kexec with the last merges after 2.6.29, I've
> > had some problems when probing e100. It would not read the eeprom. After
> > some bisects, I realized this has been like that since forever (at least
> > 2.6.18). The problem is that shutdown is doing the same thing that
> > suspend does and puts the device in D3 state. I couldn't find a way to
> > get the device back to a sane state in the probe function. So, based on
> > some similar patches from Rafael J. Wysocki for e1000, e1000e and ixgbe,
> > I wrote this one for e100.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/e100.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
> > index c0f8443..3db7b29 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e100.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
> > @@ -2728,7 +2728,7 @@ static void __devexit e100_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > #define E100_82552_SMARTSPEED 0x14 /* SmartSpeed Ctrl register */
> > #define E100_82552_REV_ANEG 0x0200 /* Reverse auto-negotiation */
> > #define E100_82552_ANEG_NOW 0x0400 /* Auto-negotiate now */
> > -static int e100_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > +static int __e100_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool *enable_wake)
> > {
> > struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > @@ -2749,19 +2749,31 @@ static int e100_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > E100_82552_SMARTSPEED, smartspeed |
> > E100_82552_REV_ANEG | E100_82552_ANEG_NOW);
> > }
> > - if (pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3cold, true))
> > - pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, true);
> > + *enable_wake = true;
> > } else {
> > - pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, false);
> > + *enable_wake = false;
> > }
> >
> > pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > - pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void __e100_power_off(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool wake)
> > +{
> > + pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, wake);
> > + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
> > +}
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +static int e100_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > +{
> > + bool wake;
> > + int retval = __e100_shutdown(pdev, &wake);
>
> I'd call pci_prepare_to_sleep() here if wake is 'true' instead of the
> __e100_power_off(), because there is a chance the platform will prefer some
> other power state to put the device into.
>
> In fact, looking at the entire driver's code, I think you could just call
> pci_prepare_to_sleep(pdev) here instead of __e100_power_off(pdev, wake)
> and discard the value of wake.
>

If there is no advantage in using pci_enable_wake with false in the case
the device cannot WOL or ASF, I will just use pci_prepare_to_sleep and
drop this enable_wake/wake variable in both suspend and shutdown. Any
reason we should use pci_enable_wake with false?

> > + __e100_power_off(pdev, wake);
>
> Also, retval will always be 0 as far as I can see and if it could be different
> from 0, it would be a good idea to return the error code before putting the
> device into a low power state (.resume() won't be called for this device if
> .suspend() fails).
>
> Apart from this, the patch looks fine to me.
>
> > + return retval;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int e100_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > @@ -2792,7 +2804,10 @@ static int e100_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >
> > static void e100_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > - e100_suspend(pdev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > + bool wake;
> > + __e100_shutdown(pdev, &wake);
> > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
> > + __e100_power_off(pdev, wake);
> > }
> >
> > /* ------------------ PCI Error Recovery infrastructure -------------- */
>
> Best,
> Rafael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature