Re: lockdep report at resume

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:11 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> > > [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; really
> > >   seems like a false positive to me ]
> > I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see 
> > flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch.
> 
> I am not entirely sure that this is the same issue as the one from #13136 
> of kernel.org bugzilla.
> 
> Anyway, for reference, the patch Oliver mentioned here is below.

Thanks. Unfortunately I have another problem that turns off lockdep so I
can't test this right now, sorry.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part