Re: lockdep report at resume

[Jiri Kosina]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> > [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; really
> >   seems like a false positive to me ]
> I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see 
> flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch.

I am not entirely sure that this is the same issue as the one from #13136 
of kernel.org bugzilla.

Anyway, for reference, the patch Oliver mentioned here is below.