Re: [dm-devel] Re: dm-ioband: Test results.

[Ryo Tsuruta]

Hi Nauman,

> > The real question is, once you create a version of dm-ioband that
> > co-operates with CFQ scheduler, how that solution would compare with
> > the patch set Vivek has posted? In my opinion, we need to converge to
> > one solution as soon as possible, so that we can work on it together
> > to refine and test it.
> 
> I think I can do some help for your work. but I want to continue the
> development of dm-ioband, because dm-ioband actually works well and
> I think it has some advantages against other IO controllers.
>   - It can use without cgroup.
>   - It can control bandwidth on a per partition basis.
>   - The driver module can be replaced without stopping the system.

In addition, dm-ioband can run on the RHEL5.

Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/