Re: Quick question about libata and hdparm

[RogÃrio Brito]

Hi Alan, Bart and Co.

On Apr 20 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: I'm not handling this bugreport, this is best
> > done by pata_pdc202xx_old Maintainer or libata Maintainer.
> 
> Be that as it may thanks - thats well spotted and definitely a bug.

Well, I just compiled the kernel both with libata and with the usual IDE
drivers.

Unfortunately, it seems that Bart's patch isn't enough. OTOH, when I use
the older IDE drive, it seems to work OK, as the attached dmesgs show
(BTW, you may notice that there's something fishy with X, but that's
another story).

Oh, just one observation: I tried to compile a 2.6.30-rc2 kernel, but I
only got errors during the compilation. This is why I used a 2.6.29
kernel.

Actually, I also had a compilation problem with the 2.6.30-rc2 kernel on
another box running x86_64. I can post them separately if needed.


Thanks for your valuable help so far, RogÃrio Brito.

-- 
RogÃrio Brito : rbrito@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito
Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org

Attachment: dmesg-2.6.29-with-libata-patched.txt.bz2
Description: Binary data

Attachment: dmesg-2.6.29-with-common-ide.txt.bz2
Description: Binary data