Re: [PATCH 1/9] io-throttle documentation

From: Andrea Righi
Date: Fri Apr 17 2009 - 05:56:19 EST


On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:24:17AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:21:12 +0200
> Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +Example:
> > +* Create an association between an io-throttle group and a bio-cgroup group
> > + with "bio" and "blockio" subsystems mounted in different mount points:
> > + # mount -t cgroup -o bio bio-cgroup /mnt/bio-cgroup/
> > + # cd /mnt/bio-cgroup/
> > + # mkdir bio-grp
> > + # cat bio-grp/bio.id
> > + 1
> > + # mount -t cgroup -o blockio blockio /mnt/io-throttle
> > + # cd /mnt/io-throttle
> > + # mkdir foo
> > + # echo 1 > foo/blockio.bio_id
>
> Why do we need multiple cgroups at once to track I/O ?
> Seems complicated to me.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame

I totally agree. I could easily merge the bio-cgroup functionality in
io-throttle or implement this as an infrastructure framework, using a
single controller and remove this complication.

For now, since the decisions on IO controllers are not definitive at
all, I privileged flexibility and I simply decided to be a plain user of
bio-cgroup to quickly adapt my patch to the future bio-cgroup
development.

Thanks,
-Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/