Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing: pass proto and args to DEFINE_TRACE

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:58:56PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:35:38PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>   
>>> -DEFINE_TRACE(power_mark);
>>> +DEFINE_TRACE(power_mark,
>>> +	TP_PROTO(struct power_trace *it, unsigned int type, unsigned int state),
>>> +	      TP_ARGS(it, type, state));
>>>     
>>
>> Wrong indentation, the TP_ARGS should have the same level of indentation
>> (one) as the TP_PROTO.  Also true for all others.
>>   
>
> It's just cut+replace+paste from the DECLARE_TRACE() definitions in  
> trace/power.h.  The proper fix is to not duplicate all that stuff in the  
> first place, but I didn't want to introduce a gratuitous re-indent in  
> the process.

When copying it to a new place I don't think that's a good enough
excuse.


Then again I'd really wish we could get Steve's recents bits merged for
various reasons.  The whole DEFINE_TRACE thing only appeared in 2.6.30
and releasing that one kernel with the half-baked inferior version
sounds like a really bad idea.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/