Re: Xtensa patches

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Apr 16 2009 - 05:00:47 EST


On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:30:00 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:24:47AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:42:13 -0700 Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > I will look over those patches and commit them to xtensa-2.6.
> > >
> >
> > OK. I have a random pile if i-dont-know-what xtensa stuff here.
> >
> > xtensa-add-flat-support-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> > xtensa-variant-specific-code.patch
> > xtensa-cache-inquiry-and-unaligned-cache-handling-functions.patch
> > xtensa-s6000-dma-engine-support.patch
> > xtensa-allow-platform-and-variant-to-initialize-own-irq-chips.patch
> > xtensa-support-s6000-gpio-irqs-and-alternate-function-selection.patch
> > s6gmac-xtensa-s6000-on-chip-ethernet-driver.patch
> > s6gmac-xtensa-s6000-on-chip-ethernet-driver-fix.patch
> > xtensa-s6105-specific-configuration-for-s6gmac.patch
> > xtensa-enable-s6gmac-in-s6105_defconfig.patch
> > xtensa-add-m41t62-rtc-to-s6105-platform.patch
> > xtensa-enable-m41t80-driver-in-s6105_defconfig.patch
> >
> > I'll drop xtensa-add-flat-support-checkpatch-fixes.patch (as I usually
> > do when someone merges the base patch but doesn't run checkpatch on it
> > - hint) and I'll send the rest over at you.
> >
> Presumably the nommu xtensa bits still depend on
>
> flat-fix-data-sections-alignment.patch
>
> ?

I don't think I ever knew that.

What's happening with flat-fix-data-sections-alignment.patch, btw? It
seems to be stuck.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/