Re: [PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: (re)Create swiotlb_unmap_single

[Kumar Gala]

> > > the patches came right in the merge window - that's too late for
> > > IOMMU bits, the patch cutoff is generally the beginning of the merge
> > > window. (Which was on March 23 in this window)
> >
> > Fair.
> >
> > > But i can queue them up in the .31 queue if it has all the Acks from
> > > you folks. Becky, mind resending the latest version, with all the
> > > acks in place?
> >
> > I can do this in Becky's abscense this week.  The only "acks" I've
> > seen are from FUJITA Tomonori.
>
> _your_ ack (or signoff) counts too - so to me it's plural :-)

I've added my signoff :)

> > Can we ask there be a unique swiotlb branch in your tree to make
> > it easier for us to continue additional swiotlb work as well as
> > arch specific work.
>
> yes - tip:core/iommu is already distinct from tip:x86/iommu and is
> intended for such more generic patches. It has no patches pending
> right now (it just got all merged upstream) - so please use an
> upstream base - 2.6.30-rc1 would be a good starting point.

Just reposted v3 based on 2.6.30-rc1

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/