Re: [RFI] Shared accounting for memory resource controller

From: Balbir Singh
Date: Wed Apr 08 2009 - 03:48:56 EST


* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-04-08 16:18:24]:

> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:41:15 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-04-08 16:07:33]:
> > 1. First our rss in memory.stat is confusing, we should call it anon
> > RSS
> ok. but ....changing current interface ?
>

No, lets just a new field called file_rss and make sure the
documentation reflects the correct information.

> > 2. We need to add file rss, this is sort of inline with the
> > information we export per process file_rss and anon_rss
>
> maybe good. *but* active/incative ratio in lru file cache is good estimation for this.

Active/Inactive tell us about frequently a page is referenced rather
than what is mapped and what is not. We could get very bad results if
we make an assumption.

>
> > 3. Using the above, we can then try to (using an algorithm you
> > proposed), try to do some work for figuring out the shared percentage.
> >
> This is the point. At last. Why "# of shared pages" is important ?
>

I posted this in my motivation yesterday. # of shared pages can help
plan the system better and the size of the cgroup. A cgroup might have
small usage_in_bytes but large number of shared pages. We need a
metric that can help figure out the fair usage of the cgroup.

> I wonder it's better to add new stat file as memory.cacheinfo which helps
> following kind of commands.
>
> #cacheinfo /cgroups/memory/group01/
> /usr/lib/libc.so.1 30pages
> /var/log/messages 1 pages
> /tmp/xxxxxx 20 pages
> .....
> .....
>

But, what I need at the moment is shared usage information.

--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/