Re: [RFI] Shared accounting for memory resource controller

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:41:15 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-04-08 16:07:33]:
> 1. First our rss in memory.stat is confusing, we should call it anon
> RSS
ok. but ....changing current interface ?

> 2. We need to add file rss, this is sort of inline with the
> information we export per process file_rss and anon_rss

maybe good. *but* active/incative ratio in lru file cache is good estimation for this.

> 3. Using the above, we can then try to (using an algorithm you
> proposed), try to do some work for figuring out the shared percentage.
> 
This is the point. At last. Why "# of shared pages" is important ?

I wonder it's better to add new stat file as memory.cacheinfo which helps
following kind of commands.

  #cacheinfo /cgroups/memory/group01/
       /usr/lib/libc.so.1     30pages
       /var/log/messages      1 pages
       /tmp/xxxxxx            20 pages
       .....
       .....

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/