Re: [GIT RFC] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the defaultpercpu allocator

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:

> > Please include the patch inline next time.
>
> What do you mean by "inline"? That the patch should not be the last
> thing in the mail?

The patch needs to show up when I press reply and not vanish. I guess this
was an attachment.

> I don't see how changes to the initial per cpu segment should help with
> access to per cpu symbols.

Can you convince the linker to place the per cpu segment > 4G away from
the code? Its a virtual address right?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/