Re: Linux 2.6.29

From: Hans-Peter Jansen
Date: Tue Mar 31 2009 - 11:32:03 EST


Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> >
> > I always wonder, why Arjan does not intervene for his kerneloops.org
> > project, since your approach opens a window of uncertainty during the
> > merge window when simply using git as an efficient fetch tool.
>
> I would *love* it if Linus would, as first commit mark his tree as
> "-git0" (as per snapshots) or "-rc0". So that I can split the "final"
> versus "merge window" oopses.

..which is an important difference. I still vote for -pre for "preparation
state" as -git0 does imply some sort of versioning, which *is* meaningless
in this state.

Linus, this would be a small step for you, but makes a big difference for
those of us, that miss it sorely.

Junio: is it possible to automate this in git somehow: make sure, that the
first commit after a release really happens for a "new" version (e.g. a
version patch to Makefile)?

Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/