Re: [PATCH 00/15] pending perf_counter bits

[Paul Mackerras]

Peter Zijlstra writes:

> Most of the previous set, except I kept the powerpc set_perf_counter_pending()
> bits.
> 
> This set also adds callchain support for x86 (no userspace yet -- am looking
> at porting sysprof). Furthermore, it has a first attempt at making
> perf_counters and oprofile and nmi_watchdog not stomp on each other.
> 
> New bits only compile tested on x86_64 and ppc64.

Seems to run ok on ppc64, except that the kerneltop output seems to
show fewer functions than before, for some reason.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/