Re: [PATCH 1/1] ath5k: fix hw rate index condition

[Dhaval Giani]

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:08:07AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 15.2.2009 14:47, Bob Copeland wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:27:39PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>>> So I finally managed to hit this on 2.6.29-rc3. It is hard to
>>> reproduce, so I hope so much information is enough to give you a good
>>> guess. This time it hit while trying to connect to an open network at
>>> the airport.
>>
>>> WARNING: at net/mac80211/rx.c:2236 __ieee80211_rx+0x96/0x571 [mac80211]()
>>> Hardware name: 2007CS3
>>> RATE=255, BAND=8
>>
>> band is supposed to be sc->curband?  8 is way wrong.
>
> If you look into the patch which outputs this (backtrace in this  
> thread), sband->n_bitrates is 8. I have no idea what I have been smoking  
> the day I wrote it, but BAND= for sure isn't the right name for that  
> thing. Sorry for the confusion.
>
>> rate could be 255
>> if, for some reason, the hardware rate wasn't in the rate table.
>
> So, we have a fix for this, right? I mean the u8->s8 sc->rate_idx  
> conversion or alike...

Where is the fix? Is it merged in? I still see this happen on 2.6.29

thanks,
-- 
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/