Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] blktrace: last round of fixes

[Jens Axboe]

On Sat, Mar 28 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This is the last round of fixes for blktrace, I hope.  :) 
> > 
> > Changelog v1 -> v2:
> >   - fix a bug in "blktrace: make classic output more classic",
> >     and rebase other patches.
> >   - re-order patches.
> >   - a new patch for filtering BLK_TN_MESSAGE
> > 
> > [PATCH v2 1/6] trace: make 'mem' argument of trace_seq_putmem() const
> > [PATCH v2 2/6] blktrace: make classic output more classic
> > [PATCH v2 3/6] blktrace: fix blk_probes_ref chaos
> > [PATCH v2 4/6] blktrace: fix memory leak when freeing struct blk_io_trace
> > [PATCH v2 5/6] blktrace: extract duplidate code
> > [PATCH v2 6/6] blktrace: print out BLK_TN_MESSAGE properly
> > ---
> >  blktrace.c     |  188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  trace_output.c |    6 -
> >  trace_output.h |    5 -
> >  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> 
> Li, Jens - what's your call for v2.6.30, can the blktrace changes go 
> upstream or should i zap the whole thing?
> 
> There are no new -tip test failures here so it's green as far as i'm 
> concerned. It's holding up the tracing tree so we need to decide one 
> way or another.

If Li deems it ready, then it has my blessing as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/