Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to workproperly in bridge -try3

[Jiri Pirko]

Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:31:53PM CET, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>@@ -2251,10 +2258,12 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> 	null_or_orig = NULL;
>> 	orig_dev = skb->dev;
>> 	if (orig_dev->master) {
>>-		if (skb_bond_should_drop(skb))
>>+		if (skb_bond_should_drop(skb)) {
>> 			null_or_orig = orig_dev; /* deliver only exact match */
>>-		else
>>+		} else {
>> 			skb->dev = orig_dev->master;
>>+			bond_change_dest_hook(skb);
>
>	Since you put the hook outside of the skb_bond_should_drop
>function, does the VLAN accelerated receive path do the right thing if,
>e.g., there's a VLAN on top of bonding and that VLAN is part of the
>bridge?

Don't worry :) I did not forget about this - just needed a bit time to
investigate...

Yeah, this look's like a problem. In __vlan_hwaccel_rx there is following line:
	skb->dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK);
This rewrites the dev so latter on when netif_receive_skb is called the hook
will be not called (because dev->master will not be set).

Ok I will put the hook inside the skb_bond_should_drop() - it seems like a
correct solution...

Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>	-J
>
>---
>	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/