Re: [PATCH] x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit

From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Date: Wed Mar 25 2009 - 19:29:48 EST


On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:15:49PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:16:14PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is already there, and has been there! But we still need to make
>>>> vsmp64.c compile only when CONFIG_X86_64 is defined no?
>>>>
>>> I still think you should restructure it so that vsmp_64.c only gets
>>> compiled with CONFIG_X86_VSMP enabled. Having all that stuff compiled
>>> into every kernel seems pretty pointless.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, not everything gets compiled in. Only the is_vsmp_box() logic and
>> related stuff gets compiled in. Other paravirt related stuff in vsmp64.c
>> depends on CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
>>
>
> Sure, but it would be cleaner if the whole file were controlled by
> CONFIG_X86_VSMP. is_vsmp_box() is already defined as const inline
> returning 0 if !CONFIG_X86_VSMP.
>

The point in this thread was, is_vsmp_box() needs to be meaningful even when
CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not on. This is needed because is_vsmp_box() is used to
determine if the platform has reliable tscs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/