RE: [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support

[Yu, Fenghua]

>Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support
>
>It looks like patch 1 calls dmar_reenable_qi but patch 2 defines it.
>
>In 2.6.29, there's no dmar_disable_qi that I can see.  Can you respin
>these against something a little less scary than -tip during a merge
>window?  (Especially since -stable will need this soon.)
>

dmar_disable_qi() is defined in tip tree already. This patch set is based on the tip tree. I do have another version of the patch set which is based on 2.6.29.

Ingo,

Do you think which tree this patch set should based on?

Thanks.

-Fenghua

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/