Re: [PATCH] module: Kill warning: label 'free_init' defined butnot used

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 21:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 20:54, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 20:43 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On m68k (which doesn't do SMP), I get:
> >>
> >> | kernel/module.c:2291: warning: label 'free_init' defined but not used
> >>
> >> which was introduced by commit 6e2b75740bed35df98b8113300579e13ed2ce848
> >> ("module: fix refptr allocation and release order").
> >> Move the label inside the #ifdef, as the goto is protected by the same #ifdef.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >
> > AFAIK, it is already fixed in -tip:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commit;h=67f5ca081c6ace125e8ccc76b8a7d99b091abaa7
> 
> Interesting, as I noticed the problem in today's linux-next.
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/271602/
> Or am I caught again by fake warnings from the bisection process?
> 

Yes, you are right linux-next is still having this problem.

You are the third guy who came with this fix.

Two of them are already applied in -tip and Rusty's tree:

----------->
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:35 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: 
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 02:37:19 AmÃrico Wang wrote:
> > 
> > Label 'free_init' is only used when defined(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) &&
> > defined(CONFIG_SMP), so move it inside to shut up gcc.
> 
> Thanks, applied!
> Rusty.
<-----------

May be you can also try linux-next tree ;-)

--
JSR


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/