Re: [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity?

[Yinghai Lu]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:03:08 Rusty Russell wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:09:37 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> cpu_mask_to_apic_id do not take cpu_online_map into account and should
>>> probably be fixed.  flat_cpu_mask_to_apicid was the one I could find.
>> Also the numaq apic.h.  I'll do an audit and send a patch.
> 
> Actually, numaq is just weird, so I'll assume it's correct.  I couldn't
> find any others.
> 
>> Yes, agree with Yinghai's fix.  I'll re-spin my patch on top of his.
> 
> But he already did it while I slept in.
> 

waiting for ingo to put that three into tip/master:

[PATCH 1/3] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling
[PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit
[PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/