Re: [PATCH 06/13] [scsi] changed ioctls to unlocked

From: James Bottomley
Date: Tue Mar 24 2009 - 17:25:04 EST


On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:12 -0500, stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/osst.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osst.c b/drivers/scsi/osst.c
> index 0ea78d9..80e7e98 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/osst.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/osst.c
> @@ -4856,9 +4856,10 @@ static int os_scsi_tape_close(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
>
>
> /* The ioctl command */
> -static int osst_ioctl(struct inode * inode,struct file * file,
> - unsigned int cmd_in, unsigned long arg)
> +static long osst_ioctl(struct file * file, unsigned int cmd_in,
> + unsigned long arg)
> {
> + lock_kernel();

What necessitates the kernel locking? When st was audited, it didn't
need it; since osst is in many ways a copy of st, I'm surprised it does.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/