Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: don't include <linux/gfp.h> to fixheaders-export-check

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:12 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >    
> > From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Impact: fix build
> > 
> > This patch fixes a headers-export-check failure:
> > 
> >   /home/mingo/tip/usr/include/linux/bsg.h:11: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> >   /home/mingo/tip/usr/include/linux/fs.h:11: included file 'linux/gfp.h' is not exported
> >   make[3]: *** [/home/mingo/tip/usr/include/linux/.check] Error 1
> >   make[2]: *** [linux] Error 2
> > 
> > Cc: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/fs.h |   16 ++++++----------
> >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index add95da..11fdc57 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
> >  
> >  #include <linux/limits.h>
> >  #include <linux/ioctl.h>
> > -#include <linux/gfp.h>
> >  
> >  /*
> 
> I think a cleaner fix would be to move the include of gfp.h into the
> second #include block that is part of #ifdef __KERNEL__, as is the
> only user of get_zeroed_page in there.

Alexey suggested putting the functions in security.h instead which is
even better. I'll submit that formally as soon as I have the chance to
test it.

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/