Re: 2.6.29-rcx triviality - How to have foo.ko module with same nameas foo.c source file

[Boaz Harrosh]

Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:05:42PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> Since sometime in the 2.6.29-rc I'm no longer able to produce an
>>> out-of-tree module that has the same base-name as a source file.
>>>
>>> This is what I had in 2.6.28:
>>> <Kbuild>
>>>     obj-m += foo.o
>>> </Kbuild>
>>> Where foo.c is a source file in the same directory.
>>>
>>> But since 2.6.29-rcx it will no longer build my foo.ko module. I
>>> had to change it to:
>>> <Kbuild>
>>>     foo_mod-y = foo.o
>>>     obj-m += foo_mod.o
>>> </Kbuild>
>>> Which changed my module name in scripts and packages.
>> We use the single .c file for a module with the same name as the
>> module all over the kernel.
>>
>> What is more likely is that your module started to include an
>> additional sourcefile (antoehr .o) in which case you no longer
>> can have a source file sharing the name of the module.
>>
>>> P.S:
>>>   Just asking I realized that I can just add an "mv ..." command to my make file.
>> Using mv is no-no..
>>
>> 	Sam
> 
> Hey hi, that was really fast ;) Thanks
> 
> I realize that in-tree it works for sure. It's when I use the "make -M ..." out-of-tree
> and... No, I changed nothing, I had this, one liner, one source, one module and all of a sudden
> it does not build. Let me check if it is a dependency problem (not rebuilding when things change)
> or does it not build at all. Checking ...
> 
> Boaz
> 

Sorry please disregard it works again, I was probably too quick to make assumptions.
I did an hard clean and every thing started to work again. I'm not sure what it was.

Sorry for the noise
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/