Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 14 March 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> > > 
> > > Ditto
> > 
> > No, because of __setup_irq().
> 
> Sorry, forgot about that. Ok. Keep the locking in pm.c then.

Will do, thanks.

OK, it seems we're approaching the final version. :-)

I'm going to split the $subject patch as requested by Ingo (API changes and
functionality changes) and post the full series once again for completness.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/