Re: [PATCH] x86-64: improve e820_search_gap()

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Jan Beulich wrote:
> Blindly putting the gap close after max_pfn might be fine for native
> (though even there I'm uncertain regarding memory hotplug), but will
> certainly present a problem on Xen. And properly searching for a gap
> above 4Gb shouldn't hurt native.
>   

What Xen-related issue are you thinking of?

When booting dom0 I reashape the guest memory to match the host E820 
map, and for domU my plan is to leave a hole at 3-4GB for pci 
passthrough resources.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/