Re: [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context

[Davide Libenzi]

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Take the time to check how fs/aio.c handle the fput(req->ki_filp) case
> > (or read my 2nd patch, it should spot the thing)
> 
> Well yes, a kludge like that seems a bit safer.
> 
> It's somewhat encouraging that we're apparently already doing fput()
> from within keventd (although how frequently?).  There might be
> problems with file locking, security code, etc from doing fput() from
> an unexpected thread.  And then there are all the usual weird problem
> with using the keventd queues which take a long time to get discovered.

Would it be a huge problem, performance-wise, to stop making ->f_count 
tricks in __aio_put_req, and always offload to fput_work the task of 
releasing the requests?
If that's a huge problem, IMO the lower impact fix would be to use 
aio_fput_routine to loop into a second list, releasing the eventual 
eventfd file*. There's no need, IMO, to turn the whole fput() into 
IRQ-callable just for this case, when we can contain it into the 
particular KAIO+eventfd usage.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/