Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4

[Balbir Singh]

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-12 14:32:12]:

> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:34:23 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post
> > soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later
> > today.
> > 
> 
> If "hooks" to usual path doesn't exist and there are no global locks,
> I don't have much concern with your version.

Good to know. I think it is always good to have competing patches and
then collaborating and getting the best in.

> But 'sorting' seems to be overkill to me.
> 

Sorting is very useful, specially if you have many cgroups. Without
sorting, how do we select what group to select first.

> I'm sorry if my responce to your patch is delayed. I may not be in office.
>

No problem 

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/