Re: [PATCH 02/18] Blackfin Serial Driver: use barrier instead of cpu_relax for Blackfin SMP like patch

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 06:07, gyang wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:37 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, Â6 Mar 2009 14:42:44 +0800
>> Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Graf Yang <graf.yang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > We are making a SMP like patch to blackfin, cpu_relax() is replaced by a
>> > data cache flush function which will count it to a per-cpu counter.
>> > If this serial function is called too early, the per-cpu data area have
>> > not been initialized, this call will cause crash.
>>
>> That's a bug in blackfin architecture support. ÂThe kernel should be
>> able to call cpu_relax() at any time, surely. ÂIt's a very low-level
>> and simple thing.
>>
>> > So we'd like to use barrier() instead of cpu_relax().
>> >
>>
>> barrier() is purely a compiler concept. ÂWe might as well just remove
>> the cpu_relax() altogether.
>
> Do you mean remove cpu_relax(), and either not add barrier() here?

afaik, early printk all runs before SMP is setup, so having it be a
100% busy wait is fine
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/