Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Andrew,

On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:24:50 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 19:13:11 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Dropped trees (temporary):
> > 	rr (build problem)
> 
> It's quite irritating and somewhat risky when this happens.  It means
> that I have to teporarily drop or rework patches to fix things up. 
> Then the patch needs to be undropped or unreworked when the offending
> tree gets restored.
> 
> Is it possible to just drop back to the previous day's version when
> something gets screwed up?

I will try this and see how hard it is.  I have done a few today with no
ill effects (that I have seen yet).

The other side of the coin is that there are some dependencies between
some of the trees that are included in linux-next.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature