Re: [patch] Re: scheduler oddity [bug?]

[Mike Galbraith]

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 16:57 +0100, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just an interesting sidenote:
> 
> I've ported the quoted patch and
> 38736f475071b80b66be28af7b44c854073699cc  (the one I've found via
> bisect) to 2.6.27 but these didn't resolve my scheduling problem, both
> my test program and my application still uses only one CPU. So probably
> the rest of the scheduling patches between 2.6.27..2.6.28 have some
> effect too.

It's probably the changes to wake_affine().  27 doesn't have the disable
sync if avg_overlap is too large tests.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/