Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.29-rc6 2/2] regulator: twl4030 voltageenumeration (v2)

[Liam Girdwood]

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:02 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > > 
> > > Note that the twl4030 regulator patch referred to will need a
> > > minor patch to work with the -next tree, because of interface
> > > change in the regulator framework.
> > > 
> > >  drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c |   62 +++++++++++---------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied.
> 
> .... and here's that "minor patch".
> 
> ====== CUT HERE
> From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Catch up the twl4030 regulator driver to the regulator
> interface change adding another parameter.  Also, fix
> some comments, and take this opportunity to shrink the
> associated per-regulator memory usage by a word.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c |   17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)


Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s)
here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest
for-next.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/