[PATCH 27/43] drivers/net/sfc: fix sparse warnings: Should it bestatic?

[Hannes Eder]

Impact: Include header file and include the function under the same
condition as in the header file.  If CONFIG_SFS_MTD is not defined
than the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined
'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file.

Fix this sparse warnings:
  drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
index 665cafb..94c9ed8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #define EFX_DRIVER_NAME "sfc_mtd"
 #include "net_driver.h"
 #include "spi.h"
+#include "efx.h"
 
 #define EFX_SPI_VERIFY_BUF_LEN 16
 
@@ -201,6 +202,7 @@ static void efx_mtd_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	return;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_MTD
 void efx_mtd_remove(struct efx_nic *efx)
 {
 	if (efx->spi_flash && efx->spi_flash->mtd) {
@@ -266,3 +268,4 @@ int efx_mtd_probe(struct efx_nic *efx)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SFC_MTD */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/