Re: What can OpenVZ do?

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:45:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:27:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Merging checkpoints instead might give them the incentive to get
> > > their act together.
> > 
> > Knowing how much time it takes to beat CPT back into usable shape every time
> > big kernel rebase is done, OpenVZ/Virtuozzo have every single damn incentive
> > to have CPT mainlined.
> 
> So where is the bottleneck? I suspect the effort in having forward ported
> it across 4 major kernel releases in a single year is already larger than
> the technical effort it would  take to upstream it. Any unreasonable upstream 
> resistence/passivity you are bumping into?

People were busy with netns/containers stuff and OpenVZ/Virtuozzo bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/