Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> That's why I handed it to you! :)
>
> Just remember we waited over 5 years for this to happen: the point of these
> is that Christoph showed it's still useful.
>
> (And I really like the idea of allocing congruent areas rather than remapping
>  if someone can show that it's semi-reliable.  Good luck!)

I really don't like the idea of making percpu memory (physically) move 
around.  It would break Xen's usage of it for a start...  Virtual 
remapping would be OK.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/