[PATCH -mm 1/2] ptrace_detach: the wrong wakeup breaks theERESTARTxxx logic

[Oleg Nesterov]

Another ancient bug. Consider this trivial test-case,

	int main(void)
	{
		int pid = fork();

		if (pid) {
			ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, NULL, NULL);
			wait(NULL);
			ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, pid, NULL, NULL);
		} else {
			pause();
			printf("WE HAVE A KERNEL BUG!!!\n");
		}

		return 0;
	}

the child must not "escape" for sys_pause(), but it can and this was seen
in practice.

This is because ptrace_detach does:

	if (!child->exit_state)
		wake_up_process(child);

this wakeup can happen after this child has already restarted sys_pause(),
because it gets another wakeup from ptrace_untrace().

With or without this patch, perhaps sys_pause() needs a fix. But this
wakeup also breaks the SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED logic in ptrace_untrace().

Remove this wakeup. The caller saw this task in TASK_TRACED state, and
unless it was SIGKILL'ed in between __ptrace_unlink()->ptrace_untrace()
should handle this case correctly. If it was SIGKILL'ed, we don't need
to wakup the dying tracee too.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c~1_KILL_WAKE	2009-02-13 11:06:04.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c	2009-02-13 11:06:56.000000000 +0100
@@ -301,11 +301,7 @@ int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *ch
 	 */
 	if (child->ptrace) {
 		child->exit_code = data;
-
 		dead = __ptrace_detach(current, child);
-
-		if (!child->exit_state)
-			wake_up_process(child);
 	}
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/