Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:636mntput_no_expire+0xac/0xf2()

From: Al Viro
Date: Fri Feb 13 2009 - 01:42:02 EST


On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:12:13PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:09:17PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >
> >> I ran following testcase, and triggered the warning in 1 hour:
> >>
> >> thread 1:
> >> for ((; ;))
> >> {
> >> mount --bind /cgroup /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> }
> >>
> >> tread 2:
> >> for ((; ;))
> >> {
> >> mount -t cgroup -o cpu xxx /cgroup > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> mkdir /cgroup/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> rmdir /cgroup/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> umount -l /cgroup > /dev/null 2>&1
> >> }
> >
> > Wow. You know, at that point these redirects could probably be removed.
>
> Ah, yes.
>
> > If anything in there ends up producing an output, we very much want to
> > see that. Actually, I'd even make that
> > mount --bind /cgroup/mnt || (echo mount1: ; date)
> > etc., so we'd see when do they fail and which one fails (if any)...
> >
> > Which umount has failed in the above, BTW?
> >
> >
>
> the first one sometimes failed, and the second one hasn't failed:

> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /cgroup,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
>
> mount1

Hold on. In your last example the first one was doing mount --bind;
has _that_ failed? Oh, wait... It can fail, all right, if lookup on
/cgroup gives you your filesystem with the second thread managing to
detach it before we get the namespace_sem. Then we'll fail that way -
and clean up properly.

Oh, well... The original question still stands: with those two
scripts, which umount produces that WARN_ON? The trivial way
to check would be to have a copy of /sbin/umount under a different
name and use _that_ in one of the threads instead of umount.
Then reproduce the WARN_ON and look at the process name in dmesg...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/