Re: [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error

From: James Morris
Date: Thu Feb 12 2009 - 17:32:09 EST


On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> IMA_LSM_RULES requires AUDIT. This is automatic if SECURITY_SELINUX=y
> but not when SECURITY_SMACK=y (and SECURITY_SELINUX=n), so make the
> dependency explicit. This fixes the following build error:
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111:error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230:error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next


> ---
> security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20090212.orig/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> +++ linux-next-20090212/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ config IMA_AUDIT
>
> config IMA_LSM_RULES
> bool
> - depends on IMA && (SECURITY_SELINUX || SECURITY_SMACK)
> + depends on IMA && AUDIT && (SECURITY_SELINUX || SECURITY_SMACK)
> default y
> help
> - Disabling this option will disregard LSM based policy rules
> + Disabling this option will disregard LSM based policy rules.
>

--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/